From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git clone questions relating to cpio Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:23:38 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7emm3v9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <3f4fd2640710011228w61ce34b5ve47ea529eed384fd@mail.gmail.com> <7vwsu6pg0v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <4701E10C.7050405@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Reece Dunn , Git To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 02 08:23:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IcbAi-0003tm-3T for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:23:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751568AbXJBGXs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:23:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751451AbXJBGXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:23:47 -0400 Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:39356 "EHLO rune.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbXJBGXr (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:23:47 -0400 Received: from rune (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rune.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E50613EECD; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:24:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F5D13FD7E; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:24:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4701E10C.7050405@viscovery.net> (Johannes Sixt's message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:11:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > FWIW, I'm thinking about changing the cpio -p (passthrough) part to use > 'cp -l --parents --target-directory=...' instead of tar; this gives us > hard links, even on NTFS. But it needs GNU's cp, of course. Yeah, that's the reason it is not appropriate than cpio, even if we forget about Windows.