From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: tracking perms/ownership Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:46:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7fz659s.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1187716461.5986.71.camel@beauty> <20070821134030.b763e9d3.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> <1187817948.5986.159.camel@beauty> <1187905879.5986.199.camel@beauty> <20070824095217.GB16853@coredump.intra.peff.net> <1187970632.6357.108.camel@beauty> <20070824205820.GA19152@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Josh England , Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 25 16:46:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOwuZ-0001vH-2m for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:46:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759500AbXHYOqs (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:46:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759145AbXHYOqs (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:46:48 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:41712 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757460AbXHYOqr (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:46:47 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3E81282B8; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:47:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:31:36 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Yes, please do. Even if you do not end up implementing the perms/owner > tracking using the clean/smudge filter, it seems odd that the filter > should not get the filename. Please don't. Go back to the list discussion and recall why any filters that depends on nothing but contents are bad ("crlf good, keyword bad"). Don't feed paths to filters.