From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-bundle: move objects and references by archive Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:05:04 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy7mqdklr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v8xeqllxk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v4ppellev.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vr6sif1ox.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Mark Levedahl To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 22 21:05:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKKBj-0000yo-NS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:05:21 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751809AbXBVUFH (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751815AbXBVUFH (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:07 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:55934 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751809AbXBVUFF (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:05 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070222200505.HTOT2670.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:05 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Sk541W0041kojtg0000000; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:16:34 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> The only worry I would have is if that exact number is too large >> that you cannot pass them sensibly in argv[]. > > I thought there is only a limitation in bash? I am sure kernel folks on the list would correct me, but my understanding is that is execve(2) limitation and you would get E2BIG.