From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] show_date(): fix relative dates Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:48:14 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy7nx5c41.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v3b656vq5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 21 03:48:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H8SlD-0004J5-9k for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:48:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751154AbXAUCsQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:48:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751170AbXAUCsQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:48:16 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:38321 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbXAUCsP (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:48:15 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070121024815.SBUW3976.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:48:15 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id DenK1W00R1kojtg0000000; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:47:20 -0500 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:34:21 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Now I expect the same of relative mode, only that the timezone does not > matter for relative mode _at all_. > ... > However, I was very surprised when "git log --walk-reflogs > --relative-date" showed me "in the future" for my last commits. Exactly. You are absolutely right. I should have done that when I did the show-branch --reflog workaround to pass 0.