From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: warning merge message Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:00:56 -0800 Message-ID: <7vy7ozv8lz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <867728.44872.qm@web31814.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200612222142.15489.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vodpvy6sf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200612222349.54363.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Luben Tuikov , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 23 00:01:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxtNs-0006zC-SM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:01:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753084AbWLVXA6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:00:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753249AbWLVXA6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:00:58 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:44157 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753084AbWLVXA5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:00:57 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061222230057.CRMY20715.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:00:57 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1z0E1W00H1kojtg0000000; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:00:14 -0500 To: Josef Weidendorfer In-Reply-To: <200612222349.54363.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> (Josef Weidendorfer's message of "Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:49:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Josef Weidendorfer writes: > In a previous discussion, you talked about switching to > the new behavior (ie. getting rid of this "first set of > branches" rule) when there is at least one branch.*.merge > setting in the config file. > > Unfortunately I can not see an easy way to check this with > repo-config, as there is no wildcard support for keys > (Ok, I can do a list of keys and grep). I think --get-regexp is what you want -- see my "patch for discussion". > I think it is better to provide an option > "pull.do-not-follow-the-first-set-of-branches-rule". > And we should make this the default after init-db or clone. Yes, but the problem is that old timers do make new clones. pull.i-like-the-first-set-of-branches in ~/.gitconfig is the only thing I can think of but that is too ugly and is already on the slippery slope of user.expert configuration which I do not think we want.