From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: prune/prune-packed Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:59:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7r954k7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061022035919.GA4420@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 22 06:59:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbVQj-0001uB-Ms for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:59:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422985AbWJVE7W (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:59:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422989AbWJVE7W (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:59:22 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:18683 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422985AbWJVE7V (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:59:21 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061022045920.FTZK18985.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:59:20 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id dGzQ1V00A1kojtg0000000 Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:59:24 -0400 To: "J. Bruce Fields" In-Reply-To: <20061022035919.GA4420@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:59:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > Both "man prune" and everyday.txt say that git-prune also runs > git-prune-packed. But that doesn't seem to be true. Is the bug in the > documentation? I think it is a regression when prune was rewritten as a built-in.