From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check and document the options to prevent mistakes. Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:53:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7vqxmb7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 21 22:53:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ft9hi-0002z7-0C for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:53:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030273AbWFUUxf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030274AbWFUUxe (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:53:34 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:20131 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030273AbWFUUxe (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:53:34 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060621205333.GUHY12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:53:33 -0400 To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:17:31 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > +# Verify the user input > + > +foreach my $entry (@to) { > + die "Comma in --to entry: $entry'\n" unless $entry !~ m/,/; > +} > + Perhaps, avoiding double negation would be easier on the eyes. die ... if $entry =~ /,/ Does it grok '"Biederman, Eric W." ' some people seem to do properly, or do we care (I personally don't)?