From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-format-patch possible regressions Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:11:24 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy7wpr97n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vhd3dubd9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marco Costalba , git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 26 01:11:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjOzK-0003nF-6y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 26 May 2006 01:11:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965073AbWEYXL1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 19:11:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965086AbWEYXL1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 19:11:27 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:11933 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965073AbWEYXL1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2006 19:11:27 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060525231125.ZVKA15767.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 25 May 2006 19:11:25 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 26 May 2006 00:18:12 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Thinking about this again, it makes more sense not to imply --numbered: Yes, that makes sense. That way you can say "Please start naming the output files at 0032-xxxx.txt, because you gave me 31 patch series last time, but I do not want [PATCH x/y] on the subject line, just [PATCH]". That brings up another issue. Don't we need to have another option --total-number that overrides the /y part above? Hmm...