* [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry
@ 2006-01-08 0:38 Yann Dirson
2006-01-08 2:22 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dirson @ 2006-01-08 0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GIT list
This test checks that git-cherry finds the expected number of patches
in two simple cases.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
---
t/t3500-cherry.sh | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t3500-cherry.sh
e9d999acb2653af449e3122872cbd4e8f8260c71
diff --git a/t/t3500-cherry.sh b/t/t3500-cherry.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..f2f9109
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t3500-cherry.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2006 Yann Dirson, based on t3400 by Amos Waterland
+#
+
+test_description='git-cherry should detect patches integrated upstream
+
+This test cherry-picks one local change of two into master branch, and
+checks that git-cherry only returns the second patch in the local branch
+'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=bogus_email_address
+
+test_expect_success \
+ 'prepare repository with topic branch, and check cherry finds the 2 patches from there' \
+ 'echo First > A &&
+ git-update-index --add A &&
+ git-commit -m "Add A." &&
+
+ git-checkout -b my-topic-branch &&
+
+ echo Second > B &&
+ git-update-index --add B &&
+ git-commit -m "Add B." &&
+
+ echo AnotherSecond > C &&
+ git-update-index --add C &&
+ git-commit -m "Add C." &&
+
+ git-checkout -f master &&
+
+ echo Third >> A &&
+ git-update-index A &&
+ git-commit -m "Modify A." &&
+
+ expr "$(echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) )" : "+ [^ ]* + .*"
+'
+
+test_expect_success \
+ 'cherry-pick one of the 2 patches, and check cherry recognized one and only one as new' \
+ 'git-cherry-pick my-topic-branch^0 &&
+ echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) &&
+ expr "$(echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) )" : "+ [^ ]* - .*"
+'
+
+test_done
--
1.0.6-g8ecb
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry
2006-01-08 0:38 [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry Yann Dirson
@ 2006-01-08 2:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-01-08 9:58 ` Yann Dirson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2006-01-08 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yann Dirson; +Cc: git
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
> This test checks that git-cherry finds the expected number of patches
> in two simple cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
>
> +test_expect_success \
> + 'cherry-pick one of the 2 patches, and check cherry recognized one and only one as new' \
> + 'git-cherry-pick my-topic-branch^0 &&
> + echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) &&
> + expr "$(echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) )" : "+ [^ ]* - .*"
> +'
I wonder if "+ followed by -" order is stable here. If you make
commits in the my-topic-branch fast enough, they would get the
same timestamp and I suspect the order from rev-list would be
left to chance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry
2006-01-08 2:22 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2006-01-08 9:58 ` Yann Dirson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Yann Dirson @ 2006-01-08 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:22:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> writes:
>
> > This test checks that git-cherry finds the expected number of patches
> > in two simple cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
> >
> > +test_expect_success \
> > + 'cherry-pick one of the 2 patches, and check cherry recognized one and only one as new' \
> > + 'git-cherry-pick my-topic-branch^0 &&
> > + echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) &&
> > + expr "$(echo $(git-cherry master my-topic-branch) )" : "+ [^ ]* - .*"
> > +'
>
> I wonder if "+ followed by -" order is stable here. If you make
> commits in the my-topic-branch fast enough, they would get the
> same timestamp and I suspect the order from rev-list would be
> left to chance.
We could maybe insert a sleep between the two commits ? Not that I
find it too appealing, however...
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-08 9:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-08 0:38 [PATCH 1/7] Add a minimal test for git-cherry Yann Dirson
2006-01-08 2:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-01-08 9:58 ` Yann Dirson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).