Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Making it easier to find which change introduced a bug
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:04:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vy87nyedp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.58.0507300919320.29650@g5.osdl.org

I have placed this, after slight reworking, in the master
branch.

[jc: This patch is a rework based on what Linus posted to the
     list.  The changes are:

  - The original introduced four separate commands, which was
    three too many, so I merged them into one with subcommands.

  - Since the next thing you would want to do after telling it
    "bad" and "good" is always to bisect, this version does it
    automatically for you.

  - I think the termination condition was wrong.  The original
    version checked if the set of revisions reachable from next
    bisection but not rechable from any of the known good ones
    is empty, but if the current bisection was a bad one, this
    would not terminate, so I changed it to terminate it when
    the set becomes a singleton or empty.

  - Removed the use of shell array variable.
]

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
---

 Makefile          |    2 -
 git-bisect-script |  158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 git-bisect-script

8cc6a083198877fc32224b73c61ec6e6cf8a96f5
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ SCRIPTS=git git-apply-patch-script git-m
 	git-format-patch-script git-sh-setup-script git-push-script \
 	git-branch-script git-parse-remote git-verify-tag-script \
 	git-ls-remote-script git-clone-dumb-http git-rename-script \
-	git-request-pull-script
+	git-request-pull-script git-bisect-script
 
 PROG=   git-update-cache git-diff-files git-init-db git-write-tree \
 	git-read-tree git-commit-tree git-cat-file git-fsck-cache \
diff --git a/git-bisect-script b/git-bisect-script
new file mode 100755
--- /dev/null
+++ b/git-bisect-script
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+. git-sh-setup-script || dir "Not a git archive"
+
+usage() {
+    echo >&2 'usage: git bisect [start | bad | good | next | reset]
+git bisect start		reset bisect state and start bisection.
+git bisect bad [<rev>]		mark <rev> a known-bad revision.
+git bisect good [<rev>...]	mark <rev>... known-good revisions.
+git bisect next			find next bisection to test and check it out.
+git bisect reset [<branch>]	finish bisection search and go back to branch.'
+    exit 1
+}
+
+bisect_autostart() {
+	test -d "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect" || {
+		echo >&2 'You need to start by "git bisect start"'
+		if test -t 0
+		then
+			echo >&2 -n 'Do you want me to do it for you [Y/n]? '
+			read yesno
+			case "$yesno" in
+			[Nn]*)
+				exit ;;
+			esac
+			bisect_start
+		else
+			exit 1
+		fi
+	}
+}
+
+bisect_start() {
+        case "$#" in 0) ;; *) usage ;; esac
+	#
+	# Verify HEAD. If we were bisecting before this, reset to the
+	# top-of-line master first!
+	#
+	head=$(readlink $GIT_DIR/HEAD) || die "Bad HEAD - I need a symlink"
+	case "$head" in
+	refs/heads/bisect*)
+		git checkout master || exit
+		;;
+	refs/heads/*)
+		;;
+	*)
+		die "Bad HEAD - strange symlink"
+		;;
+	esac
+
+	#
+	# Get rid of any old bisect state
+	#
+	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/bisect"
+	rm -rf "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect/"
+	mkdir "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect"
+}
+
+bisect_bad() {
+	bisect_autostart
+        case "$#" in 0 | 1) ;; *) usage ;; esac
+	rev=$(git-rev-parse --revs-only --verify --default HEAD "$@") || exit
+	echo "$rev" > "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect/bad"
+	bisect_auto_next
+}
+
+bisect_good() {
+	bisect_autostart
+        case "$#" in
+	0)    revs=$(git-rev-parse --verify HEAD) || exit ;;
+	*)    revs=$(git-rev-parse --revs-only "$@") || exit ;;
+	esac
+	for rev in $revs
+	do
+	    echo "$rev" >"$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect/good-$rev"
+	done
+	bisect_auto_next
+}
+
+bisect_next_check() {
+	next_ok=no
+        test -f "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect/bad" &&
+	case "$(cd "$GIT_DIR" && echo refs/bisect/good-*)" in
+	refs/bisect/good-\*) ;;
+	*) next_ok=yes ;;
+	esac
+	case "$next_ok,$1" in
+	no,) false ;;
+	no,fail)
+	    echo >&2 'You need to give me at least one good and one bad revisions.'
+	    exit 1 ;;
+	*)
+	    true ;;
+	esac
+}
+
+bisect_auto_next() {
+	bisect_next_check && bisect_next
+}
+
+bisect_next() {
+        case "$#" in 0) ;; *) usage ;; esac
+	bisect_autostart
+	bisect_next_check fail
+	bad=$(git-rev-parse --verify refs/bisect/bad) &&
+	good=$(git-rev-parse --sq --revs-only --not \
+		$(cd "$GIT_DIR" && ls refs/bisect/good-*)) &&
+	rev=$(eval "git-rev-list --bisect $good $bad") || exit
+	nr=$(eval "git-rev-list $rev $good" | wc -l) || exit
+	if [ "$nr" -le "1" ]; then
+	    echo "$bad is first bad commit"
+	    git-diff-tree --pretty $bad
+	    exit 0
+	fi
+	echo "Bisecting: $nr revisions left to test after this"
+	echo "$rev" > "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/new-bisect"
+	git checkout new-bisect || exit
+	mv "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/new-bisect" "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/bisect" &&
+	ln -sf refs/heads/bisect "$GIT_DIR/HEAD"
+}
+
+bisect_reset() {
+	case "$#" in
+	0) branch=master ;;
+	1) test -f "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/$1" || {
+	       echo >&2 "$1 does not seem to be a valid branch"
+	       exit 1
+	   }
+	   branch="$1" ;;
+        *)
+	    usage ;;
+	esac
+	git checkout "$branch" &&
+	rm -fr "$GIT_DIR/refs/bisect"
+	rm -f "$GIT_DIR/refs/reads/bisect"
+}
+
+case "$#" in
+0)
+    usage ;;
+*)
+    cmd="$1"
+    shift
+    case "$cmd" in
+    start)
+        bisect_start "$@" ;;
+    bad)
+        bisect_bad "$@" ;;
+    good)
+        bisect_good "$@" ;;
+    next)
+        # Not sure we want "next" at the UI level anymore.
+        bisect_next "$@" ;;
+    reset)
+        bisect_reset "$@" ;;
+    *)
+        usage ;;
+    esac
+esac

      reply	other threads:[~2005-07-31  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200507300442_MC3-1-A5F6-A039@compuserve.com>
     [not found] ` <20050730122007.GA8364@localhost.localdomain>
2005-07-30 17:08   ` Making it easier to find which change introduced a bug Linus Torvalds
2005-07-31  1:04     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vy87nyedp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
    --to=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox