From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-relink-script to fix up missing hardlinks Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:31:59 -0700 Message-ID: <7vy88wq5hs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20050626181516.GC20369@mythryan2.michonline.com> <7v7jghq6lt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 26 21:25:30 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmcko-00040G-F7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:25:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261578AbVFZTcF (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:32:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261583AbVFZTcF (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:32:05 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net ([68.230.241.31]:31139 "EHLO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261578AbVFZTcC (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:32:02 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050626193201.EVRM16890.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:32:01 -0400 To: Ryan Anderson In-Reply-To: <7v7jghq6lt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:07:58 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "JCH" == Junio C Hamano writes: JCH> Your latest version has an option not to die which is very JCH> good, but in a very narrow corner case, without comparing JCH> the file contents, I think the code would still do a wrong JCH> thing. Having said that, the corner case is narrow enough (and hopefully to be gone soon) that I think the current version is perfectly acceptable for inclusion. Linus, please apply. What it does is useful to encourage the "one topic, one tree" use pattern, the officially recommended way IIUC. I am a bit puzzled, though, why Jeff was the original requestor for this feature --- I thought he handles 50 heads in one repository which means there is no multiple repositories to relink across.