From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSL Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:44:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzlaeyoqz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vljlzjorh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090805181755.22765.qmail@science.horizon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org To: "George Spelvin" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 05 22:44:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MYnLs-00039u-2Z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:44:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752677AbZHEUol (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752670AbZHEUol (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:41 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:45973 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752654AbZHEUok (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:40 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5023222717; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 934E222716; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:44:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20090805181755.22765.qmail@science.horizon.com> (George Spelvin's message of "5 Aug 2009 14\:17\:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CCAA9356-8200-11DE-B50F-F699A5B33865-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "George Spelvin" writes: >> We can continue shipping mozilla one to help the last group. > > Of course, we always need a C fallback. Would you like a faster one? No. I'd rather keep tested and tried while a better alternative is in work-in-progress state.