From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pager: do wait_for_pager on signal death Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:13:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzlhxr1g8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20090111112222.GA29656@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20090111113649.GD29791@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Sixt , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 11 22:14:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LM7dt-0000BB-IB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:14:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752240AbZAKVNV (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751848AbZAKVNV (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:21 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:61860 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751023AbZAKVNU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:20 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A25C1C44F; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73D031C44B; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:13:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090111113649.GD29791@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:36:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AC25F8A6-E024-11DD-9618-2E3B113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thanks; I agree with you that I do not see a good reason _not_ to be handling those other signals at some of the "just handle SIGINT" sites, and I like the direction in whcih this series is taking us very much.