From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [Q] Abbreviated history graph? Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:45:12 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzlkfriav.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200811031439.12111.brian.foster@innova-card.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Brian Foster , Git Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 04 09:46:44 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KxHYg-0001Th-Ab for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:46:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753434AbYKDIp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:45:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753396AbYKDIp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:45:28 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:44429 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753381AbYKDIp1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:45:27 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05CA7895A; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:45:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020CC78959; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:45:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:15:05 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: ED748EC0-AA4C-11DD-B9F8-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> I'll post a simple series of four commits in a moment. > ... > Side note: it's certainly possible that we could improve on this. Right > now, "--simplify-namespace" will totally override any path simplification, > so you can't get a combination of pathnames _and_ naming commits. I don't > know exactly what the rules should be, but I could imagine that we could > do something like: > > - if no pathnames are given, work the way the current patch-series works. > > - if path-names are given, make rev_compare_tree() truen > REV_TREE_DIFFERENT if a name decoration _or_ a tree difference exists. > > Anyway, that's a fairly trivial extension to the idea, and doesn't really > matter for the basic code. It can easily be left for later. Thanks. Including this (and the --source one), the series looks reasonable.