From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtin-merge-recursive.c: make merge_recursive() static Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:47:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzloamhk2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080720192127.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nanako Shiraishi , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 22 10:48:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLDXv-0000Da-6l for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:48:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753272AbYGVIre (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:47:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753223AbYGVIre (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:47:34 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34984 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753024AbYGVIrd (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:47:33 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA7B342C3; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:47:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10193342C2; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:47:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:03:56 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D280006A-57CA-11DD-9296-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Of course, we could apply this patch now, and revert it later, increasing > your commit count in the process :-) Heh, don't tempt people, especially when we would have an interesting set of tools for statistics just around the corner ;-)