From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [SoC RFC] git statistics - information about commits Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:31:03 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzlsp73fs.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vmyospgz7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v3aqik0nz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "alturin marlinon" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 23 18:32:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JdU3A-0006st-2A for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:32:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752884AbYCWRbQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750951AbYCWRbQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:16 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:53776 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbYCWRbQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:16 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D9B2A18; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3442A17; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:31:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (alturin marlinon's message of "Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:07:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "alturin marlinon" writes: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... > The question now though, is which of these features are feasible to do > in one GSoC project? That is, which one should be done first, as I > want to finishing this feature even if I can't finish it all in three > months. Hey, don't get me wrong. Please do not start your thought with "which of these features". Proposed feature set should come from you. It's your project after all. I was NOT giving you an instruction "You should do all of these" (I am not your mentor), an opinion "These are all important" (I haven't thought things through), nor criteria "Unless you do your feature this way, you fail" (I am not GSoC admin to judge your application nor evaluate at the end of project). Nothing of that sort. They are just random ideas, I haven't even thought through the feasibility of, and/or possible approach to solution for, some of them. If you find any of them interesting, you are welcome to include them in your target feature set. Other uninteresting ones and unrealistic ones you can discard without even commenting.