From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: tracking repository Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:30:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzlsyfgjg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vabkzmltc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1205697779.12760.20.camel@duo> <7vwso2ieuu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwso2gwnf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, kenneth johansson To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 16 23:31:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jb1Ns-0003rG-KW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:31:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752722AbYCPWah (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:30:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752709AbYCPWag (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:30:36 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:57490 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbYCPWag (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:30:36 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FCC24A1; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:30:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3ACF247B; Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:30:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:18:58 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > Is "refs/*:refs/*" (mirror everything, including weird stuff) supposed to > be prohibited? No. In fact "remote add --mirror" actively creates such. See my other message about design level issues. >> Does your patch require * to be at the end? > > Looks like it just ignores anything after a *. Want checks for that as > well? Surely. Starting strict and making it looser later is much easier than starting loose and incoherent and having to deal with the resulting mess the code appears to allow people to make in their configuration.