Re: Merging using only fast-forward

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

"Sverre Hvammen Johansen" <hvammen@gmail.com> writes:

> The more I think about this is that --ff-only should really be
> specified as a merge strategy (single) and not as an special case of
> --ff.  All merge strategies can then take any number of commits, but
> will only succeed if the commits can be reduced down to two or fewer
> for resolve/recursive and one for single.

Interesting.

At one end of the spectrum, we have these crazy people who want
git to record something that is not a merge at all as a merge
with --no-ff.  At the other end of the spectrum, we have these
other crazy people who want git to outsmart them by allowing
them to throw random set of commits as potential parents,
remove duplicates and figure out how many real parents the
resulting merge should have (including the case that it may not
even have any).

I'll have to think about it, but it sounds like a promising
idea.