From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] Miscellaneous MinGW port fallout Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:13:07 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzlxgfuwc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1194984306-3181-1-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <7vir45hyyn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 14 21:14:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsOcb-0004eR-IF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:14:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762640AbXKNUNP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:13:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762728AbXKNUNO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:13:14 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:39283 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762640AbXKNUNN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:13:13 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8E32F2; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:13:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345B5959F1; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:13:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:50:47 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Johannes Sixt writes: >> >> > This is a series of smallish, unrelated changes that were necessary >> > for the MinGW port. >> >> I was _VERY_ afraid of reviewing this series. > > Why? Because we get closer to MinGW integration into git.git for real? > ;-) I know you know me better than that. Conversion from "Too UNIXy" stuff into another form that "claims to" run on a different platform that I do not have a good way of testing myself? I should feel scared, even if I can always punt and say "I'll only make sure UNIX side does not regress, Windose, who cares" ;-).