From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-branch: cleanup config file when deleting branches Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 01:45:27 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzm3akf6g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070606100947.18990.qmail@bef1f6489d171f.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Gerrit Pape X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 08 10:45:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hwa6B-0006SR-6r for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:45:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935965AbXFHIp3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:45:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936824AbXFHIp3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:45:29 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:38940 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935965AbXFHIp2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:45:28 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070608084528.AKM5800.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:45:28 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 8wlT1X00D1kojtg0000000; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:45:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070606100947.18990.qmail@bef1f6489d171f.315fe32.mid.smarden.org> (Gerrit Pape's message of "Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:09:47 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Gerrit Pape writes: > When deleting branches, remove the sections referring to these branches > from the config file. > > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape Hmph. Makes sense and might even be a maint material, but it probably is safe not to do a behaviour change in maint. Tests?