From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vzm4wupew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070425200718.GB30061@steel.home> (Alex Riesen's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:07:18 +0200")
Is this really necessary?
I would rather want to leave some tests use "git merge" while
some others use "git pull ." to catch breakage of either form.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 20:07 [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull Alex Riesen
2007-04-25 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-04-25 22:12 ` Alex Riesen
2007-04-28 11:11 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-04-29 7:17 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vzm4wupew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).