From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert t6022 to use git-merge instead of git-pull Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:03 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzm4wupew.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070425200718.GB30061@steel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 25 23:15:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgopT-0007TQ-Tz for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:15:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422770AbXDYVPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754218AbXDYVPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:35572 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753240AbXDYVPG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:06 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070425211504.IIBQ1257.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:04 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id rZF31W0031kojtg0000000; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:15:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070425200718.GB30061@steel.home> (Alex Riesen's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:07:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Is this really necessary? I would rather want to leave some tests use "git merge" while some others use "git pull ." to catch breakage of either form.