From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitweb: New improved formatting of chunk header in diff Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:41:45 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzmb1r4yu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200611081147.52952.jnareb@gmail.com> <200611081800.16001.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vfyctsmbm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200611082158.43652.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <200611082158.43652.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Wed, 8 Nov 2006 21:58:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhvB8-0000zR-Hx for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 22:41:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753523AbWKHVlr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:41:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753524AbWKHVlr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:41:47 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:11217 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753523AbWKHVlq (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:41:46 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061108214146.UAVK5575.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:41:46 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id kMhr1V00K1kojtg0000000; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:41:51 -0500 To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Jakub Narebski writes: > O.K. This one introduced new feature, and wasn't needed for earlier > accepted patch (output empty patches) to have sense. And it is rc1 > phase... I personally do not mind minor gitweb 'feature' updates in -rc cycle, just like I am planning to see if there are gitk updates I haven't pulled from Paulus (I think there is at least one patch from last month or so), unless the changes do not break it so badly. > By the way, where I can find proper specifiction of unified diff format? > Do I understand correctly that bot from and to ranges can be without > number of lines part if it simplifies to 0? When Linus did apply.c and I did diff.c, we primarily worked off of sources to GNU patch. There is a POSIX draft proposal now. http://www.opengroup.org/austin/mailarchives/ag-review/msg02077.html See also updates about the proposal. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/29331/focus=29389