From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git+ssh://master.kernel.org/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm.git Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:04:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzmeo25fa.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060801001958.67a071b2.akpm@osdl.org> <7v4pww3ktw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060801015250.cfd4f223.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 01 11:04:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7qAr-00038s-7K for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:04:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932359AbWHAJEM (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:04:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932379AbWHAJEL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:04:11 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:32243 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932359AbWHAJEK (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:04:10 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.5.203]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060801090409.PKUI554.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:04:09 -0400 To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20060801015250.cfd4f223.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:52:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andrew Morton writes: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:46:03 -0700 > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> It shows them with blue background with >> white letters, but this presentation is subject to proposals of >> better ways from the list. > > eek. If any application on my machine starts emitting funny colours I'll > immediately stop everything and go work out how to make it stop ;) > > It would be more traditional to stick "remote:" at the beginning of the > message or something. Hehehe. I succeeded getting your attention ;-).