From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: merge-base: update the clean-up postprocessing Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:21:07 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzmfnaba4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <44AB0948.9070606@gmail.com> <7vy7v8dctz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: A Large Angry SCM , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 06 01:21:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyGgD-0008C9-1g for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 01:21:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965049AbWGEXVK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:21:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965052AbWGEXVK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:21:10 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:28130 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965049AbWGEXVI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:21:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060705232108.ODEO8537.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:21:08 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:50:53 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > BTW ALAS' argument about grafts not only shot down my maximumSkew, but > AFAICT also the generation number thing. Besides, the generation number > could be manipulated by a mean-spirited person also. I think with the fixed-up version of "concepts only" patch, generation number approach is already moot.