From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce Git.pm (v3) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:20:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzmg2rpxt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v1wtghga6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060623011205.GJ21864@pasky.or.cz> <7vejxgckq9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060622220201.19132.67536.stgit@machine.or.cz> <7vlkrohj9p.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060622235017.GH21864@pasky.or.cz> <7v1wtghga6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060623011205.GJ21864@pasky.or.cz> <7vejxgckq9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060623123904.GL21864@pasky.or.cz> <7vejxf74e3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vzmg35pkt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 25 03:20:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FuJIy-0001d2-8h for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 03:20:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964841AbWFYBUt (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:20:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964885AbWFYBUt (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:20:49 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:34252 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964841AbWFYBUs (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:20:48 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060625012048.PNKU18458.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:20:48 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:10:11 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > My original idea: on a machine where you have no accurate diff, you at > least want to pass the tests, and you want to ensure you can apply a diff > you generated on that machine. I remember that, but I think recently we converted t4100 and t4101 to use pregenerated test vectors so it might not be an issue anymore? > This patch is just compile tested, but obviously correct Looks sane, thanks. I would maybe rename the option to --inaccurate-eof and default it to off (i.e. no --accurate-eof option). After all we are not talking about arbitrary inaccuracy but the particular botch of not having "\No newline at the end of file."