From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid segfault in diff --stat rename output. Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 18:02:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vzmh98seo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 23 03:02:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiLIW-0006fe-AN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 03:02:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751218AbWEWBCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 21:02:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751222AbWEWBCo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 21:02:44 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:9464 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbWEWBCn (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 21:02:43 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060523010242.QLIQ5347.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 22 May 2006 21:02:42 -0400 To: Sean In-Reply-To: (seanlkml@sympatico.ca's message of "Mon, 22 May 2006 20:36:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sean writes: > Signed-off-by: Sean Estabrooks > --- > diff.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/diff.c b/diff.c > index 7f35e59..a7bb9b9 100644 > --- a/diff.c > +++ b/diff.c > @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static char *pprint_rename(const char *a > if (a_midlen < 0) a_midlen = 0; > if (b_midlen < 0) b_midlen = 0; > > - name = xmalloc(len_a + len_b - pfx_length - sfx_length + 7); > + name = xmalloc(pfx_length + a_midlen + b_midlen + sfx_length + 7); > sprintf(name, "%.*s{%.*s => %.*s}%s", Obviously correct given what the sprintf() that immediately follows does. Sheesh, what was I smoking back then. *BLUSH* Thanks.