From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/17] Document the [...] and -- arguments to git-prune. Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:56:51 -0800 Message-ID: <7vzmnb9m7w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1134084485547-git-send-email-mailing-lists.git@rawuncut.elitemail.org> <1134084485869-git-send-email-mailing-lists.git@rawuncut.elitemail.org> <7v4q5jb149.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nikolai Weibull X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 09 00:57:42 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkVdB-0003Kc-7k for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:56:57 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932756AbVLHX4y (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:56:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932757AbVLHX4y (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:56:54 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35]:6017 "EHLO fed1rmmtao04.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932756AbVLHX4x (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:56:53 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051208235519.FUSN17690.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 18:55:19 -0500 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <7v4q5jb149.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 08 Dec 2005 15:49:42 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Nikolai Weibull writes: > >> The documentation for git-prune was lacking descriptions of the head >> arguments and the -- option. >> >> +...:: >> + The heads to look for unreachable objects in. This is >> + relative to $GIT_DIR (e.g., "HEAD", "refs/heads/master"). >> + When unspecified, all heads are updated to match the >> + remote repository. > > ? updated to match??? Come to think of it, why would anybody want to pass heads explicitly? It seems to me that it would allow you to _lose_ objects referenced only from omitted branches...