git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pat Maddox" <pergesu@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How do I set the committer with cherry-pick? (or is there a better way to get changes from someone?)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:58:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <810a540e0804051758j5daea9a8vfe36396ecbb36a08@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhcefvoeg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Pat Maddox" <pergesu@gmail.com> writes:
>
>  > At this point the commits are in the repo, but they only have author
>  > information.  I'd like to specify that I'm the one who committed this
>  > change now.  How can I do that?
>
>  You've already done that.  They are not what you _wrote_ so your name
>  won't be on "Author:" lines, but you made into commits in the final
>  history, and your name would appear on "Committer:" lines.
>
>  Try "log --pretty=fuller".

Ah, okay.  I see.  Thanks.


>  > And finally, is this a good way to incorporate changes from other
>  > devs?  Is there a better way?
>
>  A _better way_, especially because you are already pulling from them,
>  would be just "pull", without having to cherry-pick to clean-up the
>  history.
>
>  The reason you are being forced to cherry-pick is probably _their_
>  histories you pulled are suboptimal and full of garbage commit, containing
>  irrelevant changes you do not want to include in the mainline you
>  maintain.  Have _THEM_ clean their act and prepare clean history that
>  consists only of relevant commits.  Shift as much burden as possible to
>  the contributors; otherwise the central integrator will become the
>  bottleneck in the process.

That makes sense.  So let's say somebody made some changes of their
own that I don't want in the repository.  Would the best thing for
them to do be to create a new branch off of my main line, and then
cherry-pick their commits in themself.  Then they send me the url
along with the branch, so that when I pull from them it's only the new
commits applied to the main line.

And finally, when I experimented with doing a pull instead of
cherry-pick, it listed the original author as the committer instead of
myself.  I think you're absolutely right that the burden should be on
them, so I can tell them to create a clean commit branch and just pull
from it, but I still need to be listed as the committer.

Pat

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-06  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-05 23:42 How do I set the committer with cherry-pick? (or is there a better way to get changes from someone?) Pat Maddox
2008-04-06  0:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-06  0:58   ` Pat Maddox [this message]
2008-04-06  1:18     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=810a540e0804051758j5daea9a8vfe36396ecbb36a08@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pergesu@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).