From: "Pat Maddox" <pergesu@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How do I set the committer with cherry-pick? (or is there a better way to get changes from someone?)
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:58:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <810a540e0804051758j5daea9a8vfe36396ecbb36a08@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vhcefvoeg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> "Pat Maddox" <pergesu@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > At this point the commits are in the repo, but they only have author
> > information. I'd like to specify that I'm the one who committed this
> > change now. How can I do that?
>
> You've already done that. They are not what you _wrote_ so your name
> won't be on "Author:" lines, but you made into commits in the final
> history, and your name would appear on "Committer:" lines.
>
> Try "log --pretty=fuller".
Ah, okay. I see. Thanks.
> > And finally, is this a good way to incorporate changes from other
> > devs? Is there a better way?
>
> A _better way_, especially because you are already pulling from them,
> would be just "pull", without having to cherry-pick to clean-up the
> history.
>
> The reason you are being forced to cherry-pick is probably _their_
> histories you pulled are suboptimal and full of garbage commit, containing
> irrelevant changes you do not want to include in the mainline you
> maintain. Have _THEM_ clean their act and prepare clean history that
> consists only of relevant commits. Shift as much burden as possible to
> the contributors; otherwise the central integrator will become the
> bottleneck in the process.
That makes sense. So let's say somebody made some changes of their
own that I don't want in the repository. Would the best thing for
them to do be to create a new branch off of my main line, and then
cherry-pick their commits in themself. Then they send me the url
along with the branch, so that when I pull from them it's only the new
commits applied to the main line.
And finally, when I experimented with doing a pull instead of
cherry-pick, it listed the original author as the committer instead of
myself. I think you're absolutely right that the burden should be on
them, so I can tell them to create a clean commit branch and just pull
from it, but I still need to be listed as the committer.
Pat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-06 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-05 23:42 How do I set the committer with cherry-pick? (or is there a better way to get changes from someone?) Pat Maddox
2008-04-06 0:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-04-06 0:58 ` Pat Maddox [this message]
2008-04-06 1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=810a540e0804051758j5daea9a8vfe36396ecbb36a08@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pergesu@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).