From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: undoing changes with git-checkout -f Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:17:01 +0100 Message-ID: <81b0412b0601100817h2a288a4ag337c749857f2c7fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <43C2D2C4.2010904@cc.jyu.fi> <7vmzi5hy69.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060110045533.GO18439@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Joel Becker , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 10 17:17:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EwMBH-0002qL-Fw for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:17:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932112AbWAJQRE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932229AbWAJQRE (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:04 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.207]:4931 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932112AbWAJQRD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:03 -0500 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k26so1366451nfc for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:17:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n9GkgR02EdlQKTB8J9OQ7QbFpUZ61TUOLfrdElT3DHbA3YF8riiedbQtXE2gvjHP5aaZzS0/Zpxhge9sku+4V9TGtOdTmGZZgUi2woSeMAZb/eaov9RtIJmO18wv1YT7Rz64ZLf/cXkKKH8O7T09fsKTrgwzWPZ4cBphyKK0+w0= Received: by 10.48.48.12 with SMTP id v12mr85844nfv; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:17:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.248.4 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:17:01 -0800 (PST) To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 1/10/06, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Can we teach the git:// fetch program to use CONNECT over HTTP > > proxies? rsync can do this, but git:// cannot, so firewalls that block > > 9418 mean we use rsync:// > > I think it is good and well with the proxy command support. Everybody can > write a little script. > > Otherwise, where would it end? If you include http_proxy functionality in > git, why not also https_proxy functionality? And if that, why not And, BTW, why not? It may as well stop here.