From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow git-repack to optionally run git-prune-packed. Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:48:28 +0100 Message-ID: <81b0412b0603090648w4a3e4e4bwceb0ad19a2a4d15f@mail.gmail.com> References: <11417445722524-git-send-email-matlads@dsmagic.com> <20060307212918.GA9474@steel.home> <20060309102419.GA9961@igloo.ds.co.ug> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 09 15:49:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHMRN-0007Sl-7W for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:48:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751077AbWCIOsa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:48:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751307AbWCIOsa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:48:30 -0500 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.194]:65481 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbWCIOsa convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:48:30 -0500 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a27so337304nfc for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qr52e37mmkbkAPGec5H/cFNHQ99eqU0QZthwntV86YNZgF692F3liEXtLLSAh/me0dI/qJKEcwdUAJ4XGpzPasLFNjoFcWMubvukWu1m0Jg0ZYddhUdEFwCLNRteRIG4f+UnpV8VTGUjqqgtdL4Uoab70D0joDcYwF8AsKBCHUA= Received: by 10.49.56.20 with SMTP id i20mr885657nfk; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.88.16 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) To: "Alex Riesen" , git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060309102419.GA9961@igloo.ds.co.ug> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 3/9/06, Martin Atukunda wrote: > Your suggestion has merit, though it's different from the behaviour I > desired. I _sometimes_ need the pruning, and it felt appropriate to make > it an option as opposed to default behaviour. > > What do you think? > I think that my patch didn't change the default. git-prune-packed is called only if -d is given, which is not the default.