Re: defaults for where to merge from

["Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com>]

On 3/1/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > Well, I find it unobvious for pull to magically starting merging.
>
> Pull is _all_ about merging.
>

... from what the user _conciously_ meant it to.

> > Perhaps I'm using branch configuration in .git/config for too long, and
> > actually expect nothing to be merged if there is no appropriate branch
> > configuration.
>
> It is not possible that you use that feature you described for too long,
> since it was not there in 1.4.x. There, whenever you said "git pull", it

the syntax was introduced about half a year ago. Plenty of time
to get used to it

> would try to blindly pull the default branch of the remote "origin", which
> might have been correct for the default branch (i.e. the branch
> automatically set up by git-clone), but not necessarily for the other
> branches.

which everyone hated. With this change it will not that blindly,
but still unexpectedly jump to some remote branch.

> However, with the proposed behaviour, more new users would get less "Huh?"
> experiences.

yes, it will be the old users who'd get the experiences. What do they
do, edit out unwanted tracking from .git/config everytime a branch
from remote is created?

Besides, I'm was just asking about providing an option (command-line
parameter) to change the behavior to what it was before!
Just "--no-tracking"?