From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: Memory overrun in http-push.c Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:04:52 +0100 Message-ID: <81b0412b0703010204m7ccba9f0nedc14a180cf1b2cf@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070228151516.GC57456@codelabs.ru> <200702281541.41164.andyparkins@gmail.com> <20070301051323.GG57456@codelabs.ru> <81b0412b0703010015l5c91c68pd4748ae379db98bb@mail.gmail.com> <7vslcpux62.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eygene Ryabinkin" , "Andy Parkins" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Johannes Schindelin" To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 01 11:07:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMiBn-0002IB-Ra for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 11:07:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964821AbXCAKFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:05:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964840AbXCAKFB (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:05:01 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:38684 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964825AbXCAKEx (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 05:04:53 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so843193nfa for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:04:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=s8z6U28KC5KjAxnVDWyEo/zi+PGOpGRp5ypQX277TiLuvB0rovtnSEHlUL5hJMyxHcY1908KM+PqGPZ13K6vXI3Ng2ErJ3aoqrMipBKIvRC6jeH54QR4O+De0VFFnlvqIqrqfFZh5EnxT2cZPMJiKvShEyntzmPTuZtcPb3/h3c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rEQUxuh2EsXuG12nLb0qMicThIuWxCbK3hBS0rao+QsMkGpbyeIIyptEtYYOw5SmlOFsQ1QvyW+b+TbQF3Ko8tknYS8qid35Yuj0tuNaQhNM5BT8lyjDtLZxF6IoL21eGnBd7ifB09n8Ixno4hA9WV6BpbivKDCC1Qo3Nt5iWh4= Received: by 10.78.140.17 with SMTP id n17mr142639hud.1172743492142; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.139.9 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 02:04:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7vslcpux62.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 3/1/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> As Johannes pointed out, old habits are still alive. And when some > >> tool serves me the right way, I am happy with it. To make the patch > >> with Git I should create repository, hack there, merge it to the > > > > hacking on Git you already have a git repo, don't you? > > You do not have to insist on using git to hack on git itself. that wasn't it. It just haven't occurred to me at all, that someone could hack on git without using it. I feel very uncomfortable changing anything not under version control (specifically - not in git repository ;) Just haven't though of tarballs.