From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: <81b0412b0704250111h6eb0dbefh47867f4dfd7a4ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <7vodly0xn7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v647tcjr6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vejmdq63w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v647ninbq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0704231007i81ee20cx9a37f1c8a3df62b1@mail.gmail.com> <7vvefnf1wb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070423211658.GA21404@steel.home> <7v4pn6ep41.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <81b0412b0704240858w6121430fj624582539f14ceee@mail.gmail.com> <7vwt014fib.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 25 10:12:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hgcbv-00071M-9z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:12:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161846AbXDYILl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:11:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161844AbXDYILl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:11:41 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]:41455 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161847AbXDYILi (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:11:38 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so155472wxd for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e3zu7jPdlcfA4npOvrB+267kR/OTxaQkDxDirF9y7zYZ62JHzYV6nw95bfm2oi8kbA9Qcyy3Al9h/VI2FXs96WPqUtBExjh5AF2ZMfdTgb3Pif6HdFS9Y5aKVWiD4n5rsbic3qf5V/r5lSpMQw5kSM2/nWHIDgEltXpKKDRPGvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lYPRBFwOGLsHNKaVHw/A0dNEsuBZh8rcdxe3fCxdklClCGULUeCIt/GtmRe01zedpujx9DsYWv78PLkam3fgSw8Y2il/FZL8aRwQw2PfmjtwspKXLDlWmI3niRFgATBF9VrJmEhpvFCkII1yYiX++sc5Si0fHemSaLfgJvzmfug= Received: by 10.70.40.1 with SMTP id n1mr408978wxn.1177488697901; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.86.19 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vwt014fib.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 4/24/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> The content filtering is to massage the content into a shape > >> that is more convenient for the platform/filesystem/the user to > >> use. The keyword here is "more convenient" and not "usable"; in > > > > how can "not usable" be "more convenient"? > > I think I worded it incorrectly to be misunderstood, but I > couldn't word them better then, I do not know I can word them > better now. > You don't have to. I just can't force myself to believe it can be made useful. I'll shut up for now, and wait until I or someone else proves the code has negligible negative impact on the normal usage scenarios.