git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix t6031 on filesystems without working exec bit
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:16:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81b0412b0805220116h4e4ff279k2e433a8a9a1cd9fc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v8wy360l8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

2008/5/21 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> Look at what the "switch to a1 branch after committing to b1" does again.
> You modify "file1" and commit to "b1" and you now have a local change in
> file1 (because you update only the index and not the work tree) that is
> effectively a revert of what you committed just now, and a1 and b1 differs
> at that path.  You get "Entry 'file1' not uptodate. Cannot merge."  when
> you try to switch to "a1".
>
>    $ sh t6031-merge-recursive.sh -i -v
>    * expecting success:
>            : >file1 &&
>            git add file1 &&
>            git commit -m initial &&
>            git checkout -b a1 master &&
>            : >dummy &&
>            git add dummy &&
>            git commit -m a &&
>            git checkout -b b1 master &&
>            git update-index --chmod=+x file1 &&
>            git commit -m b1 &&
>            git checkout a1 &&
>            git merge-recursive master -- a1 b1 &&
>            test -x file1
>
>    Created initial commit bae7a40: initial
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     create mode 100644 file1
>    Switched to a new branch "a1"
>    Created commit 1f64f65: a
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     create mode 100644 dummy
>    Switched to a new branch "b1"
>    Created commit 98a1cf4: b1
>     0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>     mode change 100644 => 100755 file1
>    error: Entry 'file1' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
>    * FAIL 1: mode change in one branch: keep changed version

It did work for me when I tried it back then. Maybe I just accidentally
tested something else.

> If we squash the following on top of your patch, I think we can help
> filesystems without executable bit without breaking filesystems with one.
> Can you see if it works on your executable-bit-less setup?

Not in the moment.

> -- >8 --
>  t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> index f1c91c8..8073e0c 100755
> --- a/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> +++ b/t/t6031-merge-recursive.sh
> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
>  test_description='merge-recursive: handle file mode'
>  . ./test-lib.sh
>
> +# Note that we follow "chmod +x F" with "update-index --chmod=+x F" to
> +# help filesystems that do not have the executable bit.
> +
>  test_expect_success 'mode change in one branch: keep changed version' '
>        : >file1 &&
>        git add file1 &&
> @@ -12,6 +15,7 @@ test_expect_success 'mode change in one branch: keep changed version' '
>        git add dummy &&
>        git commit -m a &&
>        git checkout -b b1 master &&
> +       chmod +x file1 &&

Now, this is pointless in my setup. Cygwin just ignores the operation
and decidedddds (presumably according the file _content_ or maybe
phase of the moon) that is not executable. Working tree is still modified.

Maybe I should just live with it (and disable the test locally). It is just
very broken system which hopefully no one besides me ever gets to see.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-22  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-18 14:57 [PATCH] Fix t6031 on filesystems without working exec bit Alex Riesen
2008-05-19  4:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-19  6:00   ` Alex Riesen
2008-05-21 17:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-22  8:16       ` Alex Riesen [this message]
2008-05-22  9:04         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-05-22 13:12           ` Alex Riesen
2008-05-23 19:12             ` Alex Riesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81b0412b0805220116h4e4ff279k2e433a8a9a1cd9fc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).