From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alex Riesen" Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fetch should not strip off ".git" extension Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:43:09 +0200 Message-ID: <81b0412b0810211543p6cb8c4ej49fb7fe70c3e2917@mail.gmail.com> References: <48FC5F1B.1050608@op5.se> <7vzlkz2jv7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vej29zy2r.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <81b0412b0810211506y400ba750k2613ba19f01fb57@mail.gmail.com> <7vd4htwp6v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com, "Andreas Ericsson" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 22 00:44:29 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KsPxh-0003pJ-W0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:44:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751461AbYJUWnM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:43:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbYJUWnL (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:43:11 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:60928 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbYJUWnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:43:10 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so6466548gxk.13 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fQThhpsaZBDw+EFCvBvJfvWOznUIG7EUAQOwSCRrdV4=; b=t0Z8BcZrQxBm+8GLSIrnyc+L0nDJ10nGQVSUaSvOH8QnicAGeMfuqjbBOEQf7hsA7h OHFLOV5ii1JHyLE7K99pp/l/94mWaWZQ+11lBni4pStBESGTu/8SHK53mIfSacq5BndS nGHrJmMVENvC6N4st4CAyCyzCwnB/cikeUDi8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=F4UGP6v+atIaNA3BuNbeeUoSP3xx6Srd8SxtJZ6hXCbjIoCZowMIU6Fd+ZgU2eTlwW WH7LYyVRuO9/4uhJXtwLZl6+Kh4rCGzT/pTZsuT3qyXSrJk4XuDmE7TpLe1gHL4EkRlH JTQdzTcZDB0LaYOtpg4L7mvydY5j9vEGsTT/o= Received: by 10.100.132.2 with SMTP id f2mr4621310and.123.1224628989277; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.91.8 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:43:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vd4htwp6v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2008/10/22 Junio C Hamano : > "Alex Riesen" writes: >> >> FWIW, I support Leo on that. The "established" behavior is stupid. > > I am not inclined to respond to such an emotional argument. On the other > hand, it is fair to say that the existing behaviour is established, > because it is backed by a long history, which you can objectively verify. I found it illogical (well, stupid) and inconvinient > *1* It would be a different matter if the patch at the same time removed > the fetch/clone DWIMmery. At least such a patch would be internally self > consistent. Good idea.