From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] port --ignore-unmatch to "git add" Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:51:33 +0200 Message-ID: <81b0412b0908131451q651b40a5q187257b7bda93b0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <200908121726.52121.luke-jr@utopios.org> <1250133624-2272-1-git-send-email-luke-jr+git@utopios.org> <7vy6pna4lu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200908131540.49701.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Luke Dashjr , git@vger.kernel.org To: Luke-Jr X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 13 23:51:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MbiD5-00026O-Mg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:51:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753664AbZHMVve (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:51:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753590AbZHMVve (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:51:34 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f222.google.com ([209.85.218.222]:55508 "EHLO mail-bw0-f222.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753474AbZHMVvd (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:51:33 -0400 Received: by bwz22 with SMTP id 22so848468bwz.18 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:51:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BU8foi5SqekP1zphQRiATl48eHUXLwo5k+VuUCp3YVY=; b=r/wWDUn8rWMLEyWspWyDQNguXunPMrJ58JAN88LqcTkpfPwcv6IDqlrPlUa+smhFRF b7jcWUR5/41lQKE8nuU6rKA1Cri8rHCI94gApJFi0O99TyWvdgwDagcdhG1fJ0Dvm1kY lKTF1EPIuD0RUC6N0k0eXX7ZlTG05wlRJBC3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mPcUP+IPWhrJjYnUFg4+glhpELTrs2CQa5eUnZgXHNijLjWuj4goS95SN4JXbE8pwi Q/aNHEbFV1FIMXCkrFl/FjeBdOz0mnhn0vd3t6ApG+Ehgd57AjRYRimH4124w7Ca0New x8sSznq00xe2DuewNQr81cKQTXr0740WBgsFE= Received: by 10.204.15.6 with SMTP id i6mr868438bka.59.1250200293973; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200908131540.49701.luke@dashjr.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 22:40, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Thursday 13 August 2009 02:36:13 pm Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Now the obligatory design level question is behind us, let's take a brief >> look at the codde. >> >> > +static int ignore_unmatch = 0; >> >> Drop " = 0" and let the language initialize this to zero. > > Does C define a default initialisation of zero? My understanding was that > uninitialised variables are always undefined until explicitly assigned a > value. Yes. For statics.