From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: git fsck not identifying corrupted packs Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:49:03 +0200 Message-ID: <81b0412b0910201349o185e9e92l8cb737aa7b75513d@mail.gmail.com> References: <4ADC2D45.3020803@viscovery.net> <7v7hur1a0h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vfx9esgvt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Junio C Hamano , Matthieu Moy , Johannes Schindelin , Johannes Sixt , Sergio Callegari , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Pitre X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 20 22:49:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N0Ldn-0007Px-FN for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:49:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753058AbZJTUtA convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:49:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753044AbZJTUtA (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:49:00 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]:50457 "EHLO mail-fx0-f218.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753039AbZJTUs7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:48:59 -0400 Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so6907354fxm.37 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hnolHFxO6n3aGHSDasuIMs5SmCZMn3I8ueZy9K8U2fs=; b=c8XI8WMZaUm28q7x7kKCn0cyYIbkPI1Wmak0Ajor3BJSDemxmiRcDMX1wBvkaBDrFN +ieKY1psDvvfvM8WQowTjt0uHvX67s+rOw5R5pXE+LY9Cx8nT9vuB4j70s0GSeTi1JvX XY9fmvTegF/iMu9fMKVe3weJnMmtcFAGK4VD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V3tXhRUFDK8wtGkV1xNePWn0lcsCKxTjsqp9ssXdJSipZT9lBhOHpgIH4MqkY0vDd5 ToP9dMBetLhxyoKo9jy3i9RjAwzhVI+bfivHw114cpYJ+yPjnajBvTaPb4ECqr5w1USv jbRD1WLtedLTskc7FXpLAZECLdJlESLqCbQhE= Received: by 10.204.3.219 with SMTP id 27mr6847712bko.127.1256071743314; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 20:39, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Actually, I changed my mind. =C2=A0I do not think this so big that w= e need to >> wait for a major version bump. =C2=A0Why not shoot for 1.6.6? > > Agreed. =C2=A0With a prominent note in the release notes to point peo= ple at > it when they don't read release notes and complain that fsck suddenly > became very slow after they upgraded. I have a feeling that it either wont be noticed at all (i.e., I have ru= n fsck with something other than --full only one time in my whole bash history= , and never shown it otherwise to anyone else), or people will immediatel= y like it ("Oh, finallly! Now that feels like it is doing something!" :)