From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Caleb Cushing" Subject: Re: more merge strategies : feature request Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:46:00 -0500 Message-ID: <81bfc67a0812020546o79906a20jcd04bd42d18dd803@mail.gmail.com> References: <81bfc67a0811290848m6cb219c0y71a7266001096f2d@mail.gmail.com> <4933AC03.6050300@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Andreas Ericsson" , git@vger.kernel.org To: SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 02 14:47:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L7Vb2-0004My-Jd for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:47:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754198AbYLBNqF (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:46:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753881AbYLBNqD (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:46:03 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.236]:62144 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754193AbYLBNqB (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:46:01 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2977109rvb.1 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RgW9FjHrUJdZEoZ1YcY8gMw04FRwdv1KOYIN2263q3E=; b=C/gTk55uTw4soWYbOrl8Wb7tdiCbYTpquopiuh+UyG2NWWow1NvQDFR4YejvqOvzhe Ru5sDwNp731Mri5qiMa7RUIK9DdMZN8j2U2GMiKjSeeqSM4Uz6p8AYIyTaPv7raemrYH CRVbn34zHMyApJWCQDKbxwYXqgh7G2SeWwxXU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QkcgDDugIrvZfsAMxCRBP7nPzGtqfwrA3D6STdOnkG9ITMzUNYNatPYHk9mTbWMg8A WBCydcOPWWRyFvLCjhykii+6KymffjbWLU1VUMr7n86oM6IaCbNLEXCr/Rzmw+XLvx24 O8MVcdKD4HN+b6ejCYfOuQkbi+jwIGgObYLYA= Received: by 10.141.197.21 with SMTP id z21mr5771970rvp.107.1228225560727; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.145.7 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 05:46:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I guess that "no-overwrite" can be achieved by > > git merge -s ours --no-commit no it doesn't. which is why I called it a bad name. no-overwrite would still add new lines to the file not in ours (and no-commit isn't needed in that case) it just wouldn't overwrite conflicting lines, my understanding of ours is that it will keep the files as is. Caleb Cushing