From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin Leung" Subject: Re: Verilog/ASIC development support is insufficient in git , help! Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 22:29:51 -0700 Message-ID: <83EE186A7AF140179C6C73B367471EC7@justinuTop> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , To: "Kevin Ballard" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 11 07:30:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jv497-0006u7-5p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 11 May 2008 07:30:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751104AbYEKFaF (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 01:30:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751100AbYEKFaE (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 01:30:04 -0400 Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]:40832 "EHLO prattle.redback.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751098AbYEKFaD (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 May 2008 01:30:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7436819C0; Sat, 10 May 2008 22:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15586-02; Sat, 10 May 2008 22:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from justinuTop (unknown [172.31.253.90]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DD96819BF; Sat, 10 May 2008 22:29:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Kevin, The ability of inter-user (designer-verifier) code sync'ing without letting the incomplete or incompatible RTL code to propagate to the main build stream is going to facilitate the design flow and efficiency . The ability of local revision control means that no more over writing of design files until commit . I think these 2 things will really buy us alot . Justin > Honestly, it sounds like SVN is actually a good fit here. Just because > git is awesome for many things does not mean it is the end-all-be-all of > version control systems. SVN still has its place as the last true > centralized system. Given your constraints and workflow, why do you think > git is better than SVN? > > -Kevin Ballard > > -- > Kevin Ballard > http://kevin.sb.org > kevin@sb.org > http://www.tildesoft.com > > >