From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Leake Subject: Re: [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:43:10 -0500 Message-ID: <857g6h5ssh.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <1398047016-21643-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <5355793A.5020000@gmail.com> <53558476703cb_5c94d452ec4e@nysa.notmuch> <53558A54.4060801@gmail.com> <53558ae6f1282_604be1f30cf3@nysa.notmuch> <53559020.1050407@gmail.com> <53558f6269f91_640076f2f08f@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 22 16:43:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wcbuo-0002jl-Kk for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:43:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755962AbaDVOnP (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:43:15 -0400 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:52569 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbaDVOnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:43:13 -0400 Received: from [75.87.81.6] ([75.87.81.6:50178] helo=TAKVER) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 6F/48-30401-00086535; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:43:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <53558f6269f91_640076f2f08f@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:36:34 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > Ilya Bobyr wrote: >> On 4/21/2014 2:17 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> > Ilya Bobyr wrote: >> > >> >> Also, most have names that start with either "pre-" or "post-". >> >> It seems reasonable for both "pre-update-branch" and >> >> "post-update-branch" to exist. >> > I don't see what would be the point in that. >> >> Do you see the point in the other hooks doing that? > > Yes, there a reason for the existance of those hooks. Now tell me why would > anybody use post-update-branch instead of pre-update-branch? I have a branch which should always be recompiled on update; post-update-branch would be a good place for that. -- -- Stephe