From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Leake Subject: Re: `git stash pop` UX Problem Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 02:41:26 -0600 Message-ID: <85fvn21fbd.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <1lho9x8.1qh70zkp477M%lists@haller-berlin.de> <85fvn40ws9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <851tynz2yg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <85vbvz171p.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 01 09:41:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJfUE-0004lk-Oq for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 09:41:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752466AbaCAIlb (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2014 03:41:31 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.227]:43127 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752435AbaCAIla (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Mar 2014 03:41:30 -0500 Received: from [70.94.38.149] ([70.94.38.149:50018] helo=TAKVER) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id FD/57-15561-83D91135; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 08:41:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Matthieu Moy's message of "Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:45:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy writes: > Stephen Leake writes: > >> So a message "merge complete; you can drop the stash" would be the most >> git should do. > > From the user experience point of view, that would be good. It could > bother some users, but we have advice.* to silent this kind of warnings. > > > > So, I wouldn't object, but I don't think the implementation cost is > worth the benefit. Ok, that makes sense. -- -- Stephe