From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 02:49:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85mwfc4hab.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5356996d12ede_3e5aed7308e5@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:31:41 -0500")
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>> >> On 4/21/2014 2:17 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> > Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Also, most have names that start with either "pre-" or "post-".
>> >> >> It seems reasonable for both "pre-update-branch" and
>> >> >> "post-update-branch" to exist.
>> >> > I don't see what would be the point in that.
>> >>
>> >> Do you see the point in the other hooks doing that?
>> >
>> > Yes, there a reason for the existance of those hooks. Now tell me why would
>> > anybody use post-update-branch instead of pre-update-branch?
>>
>> I have a branch which should always be recompiled on update;
>> post-update-branch would be a good place for that.
>
> And why would pre-update-branch not serve that purpose?
Because the code that needs to be compiled is not yet in the workspace
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 2:23 [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 7:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-21 20:02 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 20:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:39 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 14:43 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-22 16:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 17:09 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 17:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 7:49 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2014-04-23 9:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:11 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-26 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-26 19:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-24 14:26 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-24 18:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:26 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 21:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:41 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:35 ` Felipe Contreras
[not found] ` <CADcHDF+XcWEkvyP3tL4ibicnaMVJpixUZu1Ces0BXWkzPGsodw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-21 22:24 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:05 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 6:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 7:00 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 6:56 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:35 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:27 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85mwfc4hab.fsf@stephe-leake.org \
--to=stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).