Re: Perl gurus: why do we need Scalar::Util?

[merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)]

>>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Johannes> please do not let my die dumb: what is this "blessed" thing all about? And 
Johannes> why do we need it in the private-Error.pm??

Ugh.  Just took a peek for the first time at the "next" branch, and I see the
dangerous syntactic-sugar try { } catch { }.  Sorry for not noticing that
earlier.

While that syntax looks like it would make things easier in theory, in
practice it is a source of leak-after-leak because it creates a closure for
the two blocks, and that can easily lead to a circular reference for
long-running tools.  This would be of some concern if someone writes
a mod_perl module or a standalone webserver that doesn't exec itself
to clean up (which it shouldn't need).

So, if there's going to be rewrite, the first part would be to eliminate
the try { } catch { } sugar, and replace it with more traditional
exception catchers.

        eval { };
        if ($@) { ... }

Note that I'm *not* suggesting not to use Error.pm - that's a great
means by which to create hierarchical error classes that stringify nicely
and carry context on the error.  I'm just saying to throw out the
try/catch syntax helper.

Sorry about that.  If it's any consequence, we got it right in Perl 6. :)

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!