From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012A3176ADB for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 13:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748612292; cv=none; b=uvzGmpntSMr+LUDxEqnvrzGq6CLh8LkOTySiEzhPcbwY3F2GRqjnu70xNctcC7pHoop6QkP+SfbMJK0GgP0+ramFtjXws3SdmpRaeRJvlYA5U0rRpL4P8jq2MKJkW0xDbLsTlp05+QN8J7SPUd4PIYiQYQXAMd2QvqigcNtf7Nc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748612292; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HvjykXrz1TL/dxyaNxvxjGR3csePOM8So3PlrgY0uVE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=A67HeMkKQ8hAphKJtb0FHsS5UL8TFjw/pZ/zxQ0/qxgjJt50MSrvixUmcAcXfUUDSlwb+k6hXsom10mWafHjCAhFaib5LfxwQsGtLy1eLdSKN17qO69dum19GuD/kGHYaVuNMV+8NFvxYpmyJlEEqCm8w2bpMmXkik2KpVakv0g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=V3KgDJXZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=c108A1yv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="V3KgDJXZ"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="c108A1yv" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF1725400A7; Fri, 30 May 2025 09:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 30 May 2025 09:38:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=fm3; t=1748612289; x=1748698689; bh=uzvwW5VlqnwliEl/X3CHF iAKqV55wULMLYdvd3rEr5Q=; b=V3KgDJXZiDKLv4MX20A1YVSE1E/Xp+ECav/7v SJ2nCyvK6dnOI5GsJp8Ju8By+GEK6Vfvqbh7qSUxZuOpdwimoC2Cu0zhmaQlvFWr zLkgnTIMMvCBTBdREjC5YzsWmLkWnp84B5QwUnpIvaGPDI6Ycce09mI2GWUc4Ht1 kAnnTke3A3FlDcxM4M5bE1Sl9GVNqoxIv0diX3NsFV/gg70AtR/qUcA+aLMJfUBt kiBn6hDi23I2iWvixgNW82U+wrCXDv/kIHrp8z9psmg1BtYgrv5cHjlL+2ZyrJUE wqWfiOn9+OhWArYmuNJFeLqiPak+YrSt8vQX9NQJLqA6y165g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1748612289; x=1748698689; bh=uzvwW5VlqnwliEl/X3CHFiAKqV55wULMLYd vd3rEr5Q=; b=c108A1yvKJEFJnJPmnBSQE3Fm20dt6yhTsxwj+d2dwoFqfGXdsk bTmP2PuSoGKrcCjFqxaUIF0ninL/3DeREKZtq5venQFLhxlf++qTPlyfih1mRivb HfdhRLk/pUSUWgHEgFcscZ+YkescEeWIkPTl2ZYlh7SHQpgt39qf1XiGCPA6wweP wI2P7SJ04dlA49mp6gbSjLnn+vEVafT/n9+LrtHrJH516Rbkn3QMF+Bt1blDmuhV S4SAtgrWspRFTcl5pvzW2H6p9uF5EfrBWqXro+6xIUSLtza8qRx9/OXtPvUFdEXI Z6V1uwnH2QRiyzxQY+miqTc7sD9PAczfbOA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgddvleduheculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufhffffk fgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceogh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieegudefueei jeejvdeffeeiueetkeekvefhvdfhiefhjeekheehgfehteejleevnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosgho gidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepjedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpth htohepshhunhhshhhinhgvsehsuhhnshhhihhnvggtohdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehk ihhmfiiftdeftdeisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrihhsthhofhhfvg hrhhgruhhgshgsrghkkhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhg ihhtghgrughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrd hkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohep ghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 30 May 2025 09:38:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Sunshine Cc: oneee , Kristoffer Haugsbakk , Josh Soref , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: sparse-checkout: Fix list markers References: <4c1f645b-42fb-40b9-987e-08ce9e057e01@app.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 06:38:03 -0700 Message-ID: <871ps6b4n8.fsf@gitster.g> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Eric Sunshine writes: > You're welcome to submit an additional patch implementing Kristoffer's > suggestion. Normally, it would make sense to send them both as a > two-patch series, however, I'm not so sure that that would be a good > idea in this case. The reason I question it is that the original patch > is an obvious and uncontroversial fix, however, Kristoffer's > suggestion -- because it is a subjective change -- may get pushback > from reviewers. I had the same thought. If I were working on this topic, I'd send the original as-is with the suggested name fix, let it graduate, and then after all the dust settled, do enumeration-style changes as a new and totally independent patch, which may cover enumerations other than this single instance. Thanks.