From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] remote-hg: more improvements Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:03:32 +0200 Message-ID: <871tvvshmz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1399169814-20201-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <536a999e2c0c_76ff7a52ec1e@nysa.notmuch> <536ad9601b73b_3caaa612ecdc@nysa.notmuch> <87mweku2pt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87iop8u1km.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87egzwtthf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87a9aktqms.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5373cfb744982_57c3bfb300a0@nysa.notmuch> <87mwekrsap.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5373e2af9ae58_592416ad2f892@nysa.notmuch> <87egzwrovr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5373ee6be6d88_7411589304d6@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Philippe Vaucher , Junio C Hamano , "git\@vger.kernel.org" To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 15 08:03:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wkolb-0007Ux-K4 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 08:03:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753711AbaEOGDj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 02:03:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35779 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753467AbaEOGDj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 02:03:39 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34820 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkolR-00021z-Sb; Thu, 15 May 2014 02:03:34 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1F16E0BD9; Thu, 15 May 2014 08:03:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5373ee6be6d88_7411589304d6@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Wed, 14 May 2014 17:30:03 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Shouting "your God is an imaginary shithead" every time you see Mark > > There's no point in discussing with an unconstructive person as you. So go to a constructive person you call your friend and show him one of your calm rational mails and ask him for his opinion. Did you do so? Why not? Are you so infallible in communication that a second opinion from someone you trust would be irrelevant? Or is there nobody you trust? > I've made my point, you are just talking nonsense. > > Every rational person on this list knows that if I wanted to, I could > be much more offsensive and insulting. It would not appear that there any rational persons on this list apart from you. Not that it matters. I think that all the other irrational people on this list are rather more interested in your potential of being less offensive and insulting. Once the cure is worse than the ailment, namely you cause fewer work to be done on Git by your presence than you can do yourself, because of you distracting others and/or making them leave, it does not matter whether it could be even worse. -- David Kastrup