From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greened@obbligato.org Subject: Re: [BUG?] git-subtree behavior when the -P tree is removed and recreated Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:43:13 -0600 Message-ID: <871ue54r0u.fsf@waller.obbligato.org> References: <877gozuooz.fsf@pctrast.inf.ethz.ch> <7v8v8uav8t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Tomi Belan , Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org, Avery Pennarun To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 01 02:44:23 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpqts-0001Tu-U4 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 02:44:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751283Ab3AABnz (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:43:55 -0500 Received: from li209-253.members.linode.com ([173.255.199.253]:48238 "EHLO johnson.obbligato.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751111Ab3AABny (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:43:54 -0500 Received: from c-75-73-20-8.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([75.73.20.8] helo=waller.obbligato.org) by johnson.obbligato.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpr0a-0005NB-0F; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:51:12 -0600 In-Reply-To: <7v8v8uav8t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 19 Dec 2012 07:59:14 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Filter-Spam-Score: () X-Filter-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "johnson.obbligato.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Junio C Hamano writes: > Maybe it is a seasonal thing, just before the holiday season, but > this has been unresponded for a couple of months, not even with a > "That combination is not supported", or "Thanks for a bug report". [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BO Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Maybe it is a seasonal thing, just before the holiday season, but > this has been unresponded for a couple of months, not even with a > "That combination is not supported", or "Thanks for a bug report". I did finally see this message. I totally admit that I've been pretty absent. It just happens that I have a ton of paid work to do and voluteer work unfortunately comes last, after family and after paid work. For this bug I honestly don't know what is supposed to happen. I'm still learning the code. It's a bit of a shell-script mess to be honest, very hard to follow. That's why it's still in contrib/ and will remain so for a while. I am more than happy for others to jump in and help out. I'm not a gatekeeper. -David