From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl Worth Subject: Re: FEATURE REQUEST: git-format-path: Add option to encode patch content Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:01:04 -0700 Message-ID: <871wi1o733.wl%cworth@cworth.org> References: <7vslalmwcx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87y7kdo6pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87wszxo2b5.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87tzv1nzd4.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Apr_30_15:01:04_2007-1"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jari Aalto , git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 01 00:01:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hidvo-0007fn-El for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 00:01:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423363AbXD3WBL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423735AbXD3WBL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:11 -0400 Received: from theworths.org ([217.160.253.102]:50954 "EHLO theworths.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423363AbXD3WBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:09 -0400 Received: (qmail 9643 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2007 18:01:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (HELO raht.cworth.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Apr 2007 18:01:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.4 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Apr_30_15:01:04_2007-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > Why would it be? > > Maybe for small projects with strictly linear development, but I get a > _lot_ of patch-series where the patches are independent of each other. > Andrew's patch-series are one example, but so is a lot of the "trivial > tree" patch-series too. Ah. So here we were just using different definitions of "patch series". I was using it the sense of a series of patches that were strongly dependent. I definitely agree with you that independent patches belong in separate email messages. No doubt about that. -Carl --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Apr_30_15:01:04_2007-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGNmcg6JDdNq8qSWgRAn33AJ9JSUguHPcW7qq4llPzhvxCozMfhwCghzcD 6jmqypuhzTBUJYarZ4ySsTI= =7LOV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Apr_30_15:01:04_2007-1--