From: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Documentation: put blame/log -L in sticked form
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:59:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874n7ywpnd.fsf@thomasrast.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqiowed6t3.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:09:28 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> writes:
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>> I agree that this patch may reduce confusion locally, but if we were
>>> to go in this direction, we should be consistent and enforce "stuck"
>>> form everywhere,
>>
>> Hmm. Do you want to go there?
>
> Absolutely not ;-)
>
> But that unpleasant place would be the logical conclusion where this
> patch leads us to, I would have to say. I was hoping that there is
> an alternative solution to avoid that.
>
> For example, gitk's parseviewargs is very well aware of the options
> it supports, and it goes through the argument list one by one,
> acting on what option it is looking at. Couldn't it be extended to
> handle options with stuck and unstuck form? After all, it has to
> know that "-L" and "-S" are supported options; it wouldn't be too
> much to ask for the parser to also know that "-L" eats the next
> token (i.e. pass the pair <"-L", next token> intact as two separate
> args to the underlying "log") while it can pass "-L?*" as is, no?
It's not quite that easy because gitk does two-stage processing, and the
big switch you are discussing here is only the second one. The first
one is git-rev-parse, and while it happens to know about '-n 1', it does
not recognize any other unstuck option arguments. (I haven't stared too
long, but I think git-rev-parse is important to distinguish revisions
from paths.)
I actually burned some train time today looking into this, and the
situation is much worse than I thought. There is absolutely no
consistency in any dimension:
a) many commands use parse_options internally, where mandatory args can
be stuck or unstuck, but optional args must be stuck
a1) git branch --{contains,merged,no-merged} take a mandatory arg,
except if they are last on the command line, in which case the
option reverts to the default (HEAD). Effectively this means the
argument is half-optional but the spelling seen in the wild is
usually unstuck.
a2) git-rev-parse (at least) still handrolls its parsing, so no
--default=HEAD
a3) git-commit-tree does not understand any of its short options in
stuck form (!)
b) the perl scripts mostly seem to be using Getopt::Long which handles
things similarly, though I can't quote chapter&verse
b1) just to prove a point: git-add--interactive. I'm sure there's a
user-facing exception somewhere too...
c) shell scripts mostly go through git-sh-setup, using parseopt
internally
c1) git-filter-branch
d) gitk doesn't do *un*stuck as explained above
On top of that, documentation is a wild mash of styles, sometimes even
in the same manpage. For example, git-describe(1) tells the poor user
about --candidates=<n> and four paragraphs further down about --match
<pattern>.
So my short-term plan just became: document instead of fix; clean up
manpages towards the stuck form for long options; have gitk only parse
-Lstuck.
Medium term we can move gitk to a different option parser, resolving at
least that inconsistency.
Longer term we can see about moving some more of the remaining craziness
towards parseopt, getting consistency for free.
--
Thomas Rast
tr@thomasrast.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 19:44 [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 19:44 ` [PATCH gitk 1/4] gitk: refactor per-line part of getblobdiffline and its support Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 19:44 ` [PATCH gitk 2/4] gitk: split out diff part in $commitinfo Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 19:44 ` [PATCH gitk 3/4] gitk: support showing the gathered inline diffs Thomas Rast
2013-06-09 19:44 ` [PATCH gitk 4/4] gitk: recognize -L option Thomas Rast
2013-07-23 15:19 ` [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L Thomas Rast
2013-07-29 19:37 ` Thomas Rast
2013-07-29 20:07 ` Jens Lehmann
2013-07-31 13:17 ` Thomas Rast
2013-08-18 11:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-08-19 8:21 ` Thomas Rast
2013-08-19 17:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-13 6:31 ` Thomas Rast
2013-10-14 5:25 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-10-20 16:57 ` [PATCH] Documentation: revamp gitk(1) Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] gitk -L Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] gitk: support -G option from the command line Thomas Rast
2013-10-30 0:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-30 6:30 ` Thomas Rast
2013-10-30 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] gitk: refactor per-line part of getblobdiffline and its support Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] gitk: split out diff part in $commitinfo Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] gitk: support showing the gathered inline diffs Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] gitk: recognize -L option Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] Documentation: put blame/log -L in sticked form Thomas Rast
2013-10-30 1:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-30 6:29 ` Thomas Rast
2013-10-30 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-10-30 18:59 ` Thomas Rast [this message]
2013-10-30 19:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 0/5] gitk -L Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 1/5] gitk: support -G option from the command line Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 2/5] gitk: refactor per-line part of getblobdiffline and its support Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 3/5] gitk: split out diff part in $commitinfo Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 4/5] gitk: support showing the gathered inline diffs Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 5/5] gitk: recognize -L option Thomas Rast
2013-12-01 22:25 ` [PATCH v3 gitk 0/5] gitk -L Paul Mackerras
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Documentation: stuck arguments and gitk log -L Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] commit-tree: use prefixcmp instead of memcmp(..., N) Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Documentation: convert to --option=arg form where possible Thomas Rast
2013-11-16 17:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Documentation/gitk: document -L option Thomas Rast
2013-10-29 7:20 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] " Thomas Rast
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874n7ywpnd.fsf@thomasrast.ch \
--to=tr@thomasrast.ch \
--cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).