From: Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@atmark-techno.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: RFC: s/git-merge-base/git-find-common-ancestor/g
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:02:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874q8s6q9w.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7virxbtder.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
At Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:14:52 -0700,
Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> The "master" branch post 0.99.6 already has the renamed tools
> with backward compatibility symlinks. I'll be sending a
> patch to address an issue raised by some people separately to
> see what the list thinks, and also will attempt to send out a
> patch for the Pasky and Catalin heads later this week. Also
> I'll remove the ancient backward compatible environment variable
> names from gitenv.c.
everything seems very consistent indeed, except one command:
git-merge-base
I've already got used to it. but, at first, the name gave me the
impression that it merge the current branch with given base point.
the current documentation says:
Finds as good a common ancestor as possible for a merge
so would it be better to rename it to:
git-find-common-ancestor
That's what the command does after all.
--
yashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 0:08 GIT 0.99.6 Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 22:14 ` Tool renames and 'ls-files -t' output Junio C Hamano
2005-09-09 9:20 ` Post 0.99.7 preperation patches Junio C Hamano
2005-09-12 1:26 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-11 7:02 ` Yasushi SHOJI [this message]
2005-09-11 7:38 ` RFC: s/git-merge-base/git-find-common-ancestor/g Junio C Hamano
2005-09-11 8:40 ` [PATCH] Rename git-merge-base to git-find-merge-base Yasushi SHOJI
2005-09-09 0:58 ` [RFC/Patch] Tool rename fallout fix Junio C Hamano
2005-09-17 16:43 ` No GIT 0.99.7 today Junio C Hamano
2005-09-18 23:37 ` [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.7 Junio C Hamano
2005-09-18 23:40 ` What to expect after " Junio C Hamano
2005-09-19 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-19 2:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-19 9:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-09-19 14:15 ` Joachim B Haga
2005-09-19 15:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-19 6:02 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-09-19 7:35 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-19 8:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-19 8:36 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-19 14:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-19 1:14 ` [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.15 Petr Baudis
2005-09-19 23:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-20 0:35 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-20 0:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-19 2:24 ` [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.7 Nigel Cunningham
2005-09-19 12:01 ` Chris White
2005-09-19 6:21 ` Alan Chandler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874q8s6q9w.wl@mail2.atmark-techno.com \
--to=yashi@atmark-techno.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).